20 May, 2026

Try This: What Is Our Funder Value-Add?

By |2026-05-20T13:50:23-04:00May 20th, 2026|Categories: Strategic Planning & Sustainability|Tags: , , , |0 Comments

Three women collaborate around a table, reviewing information on a laptop during a strategy discussion. A Black woman stands and points to the screen while two colleagues seated at the table look on. The image includes the text “Try This: What Is Our Funder Value-Add?” on a gold background with Nicole Clark Consulting branding.
Try this activity with your team and let me know what you discover about your funder value-add.

In my last two posts, I explored why funders should evaluate their portfolios and how to identify structure barriers that prevent grantees from seeking funding. A strong portfolio reflects the role a funder plays in helping grantee organizations succeed.

This raises an important question for program officers:

Why would a strong organization want to be part of our portfolio?

The answer may seem obvious: Funding.

But the strongest funder-grantee relationships shape strategy, absorb risk, convene partners, influence the field, and create the conditions for learning and adaptation.

This month’s Try This activity is designed to help program officers clarify what their organization contributes beyond the check.

Objective:

To help program officers and senior program officers articulate the unique value their foundation brings to grantees and the broader ecosystem.

This activity is ideal for:

  • Program officers
  • Philanthropy staff responsible for funding portfolio strategy
  • Evaluation and learning staff

What you’ll need:

  • 90 minutes of uninterrupted time
  • Copies of your funding strategy, theory of change, or strategic plan
  • Recent grantee feedback (if available)
  • Sticky notes or a shared virtual whiteboard
  • Flip chart paper or a document for capturing reflections
  • Markers for sticky notes and flip chart paper

The steps:

(more…)
13 May, 2026

How Funders Can Identify Structural Funding Barriers

By |2026-05-13T14:56:07-04:00May 13th, 2026|Categories: Strategic Planning & Sustainability|Tags: , , , , |0 Comments

Illustration of a Black woman using a wheelchair while working at a computer, with the text “How Funders Can Identify Structural Funding Barriers ” and Nicole Clark Consulting branding.

When program officers evaluate their funding portfolios, it’s natural to focus on grantee performance: Did organizations meet their goals? What outcomes did they achieve? Which approaches showed the most promise?

These are important questions, yet they tell only part of the story.

Sometimes the biggest barriers to impact have nothing to do with grantee organizations. Instead, the biggest barriers may be embedded in the structures surrounding the funding itself.

From application requirements and reporting expectations to payment terms and assumptions about what “capacity” should look like, If funders want to build stronger investment portfolios, they should identify not only how grantees perform, but how funding practices shape who can access resources and succeed.

(more…)
6 May, 2026

Ask Nicole: What Is A Strong Funder Portfolio?

By |2026-05-11T11:41:53-04:00May 6th, 2026|Categories: Strategic Planning & Sustainability|Tags: , , , , , |0 Comments

Headshot of Nicole Clark promoting a blog post titled “Ask Nicole: What Is A Strong Funder Portfolio?” for philanthropic program officers.
Have a question you’d like to be featured? Let me know.

I wrote about why funders should create a process for evaluating their portfolios. Since then, I’ve been sitting with a related question: What makes a funder portfolio strong?

In my work with funders — particularly those who have brought me in to support their grantees — I’ve seen how easy it is for portfolios to take shape organically rather than intentionally. Over time, investments accumulate, priorities evolve, and new opportunities emerge. And while each individual grant may be well-intentioned, the portfolio as a whole may not reflect a clear strategy.

That’s where a more strategic, portfolio-level lens becomes essential.

Here are five questions to ask:

(more…)
4 Mar, 2026

Ask Nicole: Why Should Funders Evaluate Their Portfolios?

By |2026-03-03T23:32:14-05:00March 4th, 2026|Categories: Research & Evaluation|Tags: , , , , |0 Comments

Headshot of Nicole Clark promoting a blog post titled “Why Should Funders Evaluate Their Portfolios?” for philanthropic program officers.
Have a question you’d like to be featured? Let me know.

Over the past few years, I’ve found myself increasingly in spaces with funders.

Not only are they hiring me to evaluate individual grantee programs, but I’m also working alongside their grantees, support learning agendas, and strengthen strategy implementation.

In one recent engagement, I partnered with a funder to develop a theory of change designed to sharpen and improve their investments in sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice. That work pushed me to think more deeply about the relationship between how funders award individual grants and the broader ecosystem a funder is trying to influence.

Recently, I’ve shifted my focus toward evaluating at a more strategic level.

Not only should we ask, “Did this grantee meet their outputs?”, funders should also ask, “Is this portfolio coherent?Is it equitable? What measurable change is this portfolio driving, and how has it increased grantees’ capacity to sustain that change?

These are bigger questions. To answer them, funders — especially program officers responsible for managing funding portfolios — must step back and examine not only what they fund, but how and why they fund it.

(more…)
25 Feb, 2026

Strong Programs Are Evidence-Based AND Community-Informed

By |2026-02-21T18:14:31-05:00February 25th, 2026|Categories: Program, Service, & Campaign Design|Tags: , , , |0 Comments

Strong programs are evidence-based AND community-informed, integrating data and community knowledge.

Over the past few weeks, I’ve examined how “evidence-based” standards shape nonprofit work, how they can gatekeep access, and how they strain teams when expectations exceed infrastructure.

Yet one tension continues to surface in these conversations.

Many nonprofit teams feel pressure to choose between being evidence-based and being community-informed, as if rigor and relevance can’t coexist.

Strong organizations don’t abandon being data-driven to honor community voice, and they don’t silence community knowledge to appear credible.

They integrate both.

(more…)

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.
Go to Top