6 Aug, 2026

Ask Nicole: Data for Learning vs. Accountability

By |2026-08-19T11:30:00-04:00August 6th, 2026|Categories: Research & Evaluation|Tags: , , , , , |0 Comments

Have a question you’d like to be featured? Let me know.

In 2017, I facilitated a focus group for participants involved in a leadership project. As part of the project, some participants received funding to implement small scaled engagement events in their local communities. One participant hosted an event to engage community members, and while the host anticipated over 100 attendees, the actual number was a quarter of that.

Based on the attendee numbers, the host shared that she didn’t think her event had been very successful because “not many people” attended.

At first glance, that conclusion made sense. We’re socialized to believe that attendance is the most visible measure of success. Fewer attendees could easily feel like a missed opportunity.

But as the conversation continued, a different story emerged.

The participants who attended remained engaged throughout the event. They asked thoughtful questions, contributed to meaningful discussions, and continued interacting after the session ended. What initially looked like a disappointing turnout became evidence of something much more valuable: The event still fostered genuine engagement.

That experience has stayed with me for years because it illustrates an important lesson about data: The numbers we collect don’t always tell the whole story.

(more…)
8 Jul, 2026

Ask Nicole: Are We Planning Too Much?

By |2026-07-15T12:14:08-04:00July 8th, 2026|Categories: Strategic Planning & Sustainability|Tags: , , , |0 Comments

A purple "Ask Nicole" blog graphic featuring Nicole Clark smiling in a yellow blouse. The headline reads, "Are We Planning Too Much?" The bottom of the graphic displays "Nicole Clark Consulting" and the tagline, "Raise Your Voice for Women & Girls of Color."
Have a question you’d like to be featured? Let me know.

I recently watched a YouTube video called Why American Cities Can’t Build Anythingand I noticed how it mirrors what I’ve experienced over the past decade as a consultant working with nonprofits and foundations.

One quote from the video especially stood out to me:

“Around the United States, cities have become trapped in an endless cycle of visioning, planning, designing, consulting, studying, and redesigning, all while struggling to build meaningful change that they set out to achieve… planning has become a substitute for action.”

Organizations often hire consultants to facilitate strategic planning, conduct evaluations, lead community engagement, facilitate listening sessions, and make sense of complex issues. These services are valuable. Organizations should take time to understand the problems they’re trying to solve before investing resources into solutions.

At what point does planning delay action?

To be fair, there are important historical reasons why planning often takes longer today than it did decades ago.

Communities have learned, often through painful experiences, what can happen when governments, planners, and developers move projects forward without community input. Those decisions have displaced entire neighborhoods. Public investments have overlooked the people most affected by them. Large institutions and corporations no longer receive the same level of unquestioned trust they once did. As a result, community engagement, public participation, and transparency have become essential parts of planning processes. That’s a good thing.

The challenge is ensuring that planning still serves its original purpose: Helping us make better decisions and move toward implementation.

(more…)
1 Jun, 2026

Ask Nicole: What I’ve Learned After 10 Years of Consulting

By |2026-06-04T14:09:11-04:00June 1st, 2026|Categories: Consulting|Tags: , |0 Comments

Portrait of Nicole Clark on a purple background with the text "Ask Nicole: What I've Learned After 10 Years of Consulting" and Nicole Clark Consulting branding at the bottom.
Have a question you’d like to be featured? Let me know.

On June 1, 2016, I became a full time consultant after nearly 6 years at my old job.

At the time, I asked myself: Can I really do this? The answer wasn’t found in a single leap of faith. It came from years of relationship-building, preparation, and learning to trust that I could create opportunities for myself. A year later, that question had shifted to How do I survive and grow? My biggest lesson was that success required far more than technical expertise. It required adaptability, resilience, continuous learning, and a willingness to navigate uncertainty.

By my third year, I found myself asking a different question: How do I play bigger? I had proven that I could build a consulting practice. The challenge became expanding my vision, taking bigger risks, and pursuing opportunities that felt beyond my comfort zone. At the five-year mark, my attention shifted again. Instead of focusing on growth, I asked: What actually drives success? The answer surprised me. It wasn’t marketing, proposals, or business development strategies. It was relationships. The community I built over time led to many of the opportunities, referrals, collaborations, and growth I experienced.

When I reflected on eight years of consulting, the question became more personal: What kind of life am I building? By then, I had started thinking less about sustaining a business and more about ensuring the business aligned with my values, priorities, and the life I wanted to create.

Now, ten years in, I find myself asking an entirely different set of questions. I’m thinking less about how to build a consulting practice and more about how consulting fits into a larger vision for my work, my contributions to my professional fields and to reproductive justice, and the impact I hope to have over the next decade. I’m thinking about systems, organizational change, partnerships, legacy, and what it means to move from delivering services to building something that extends beyond billable hours.

The first decade of consulting was largely about proving to myself that I could build a successful practice. The next decade, I suspect, will be about deciding what I want that practice to become.

What happens when a social worker spends 10 years consulting and arrives at a different set of questions than the ones she started with? Here are ten reflections I’ve learned from ten years of full-time consulting:

(more…)
6 May, 2026

Ask Nicole: What Is A Strong Funder Portfolio?

By |2026-05-11T11:41:53-04:00May 6th, 2026|Categories: Strategic Planning & Sustainability|Tags: , , , , , |0 Comments

Headshot of Nicole Clark promoting a blog post titled “Ask Nicole: What Is A Strong Funder Portfolio?” for philanthropic program officers.
Have a question you’d like to be featured? Let me know.

I wrote about why funders should create a process for evaluating their portfolios. Since then, I’ve been sitting with a related question: What makes a funder portfolio strong?

In my work with funders — particularly those who have brought me in to support their grantees — I’ve seen how easy it is for portfolios to take shape organically rather than intentionally. Over time, investments accumulate, priorities evolve, and new opportunities emerge. And while each individual grant may be well-intentioned, the portfolio as a whole may not reflect a clear strategy.

That’s where a more strategic, portfolio-level lens becomes essential.

Here are five questions to ask:

(more…)
4 Mar, 2026

Ask Nicole: Why Should Funders Evaluate Their Portfolios?

By |2026-03-03T23:32:14-05:00March 4th, 2026|Categories: Research & Evaluation|Tags: , , , , |0 Comments

Headshot of Nicole Clark promoting a blog post titled “Why Should Funders Evaluate Their Portfolios?” for philanthropic program officers.
Have a question you’d like to be featured? Let me know.

Over the past few years, I’ve found myself increasingly in spaces with funders.

Not only are they hiring me to evaluate individual grantee programs, but I’m also working alongside their grantees, support learning agendas, and strengthen strategy implementation.

In one recent engagement, I partnered with a funder to develop a theory of change designed to sharpen and improve their investments in sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice. That work pushed me to think more deeply about the relationship between how funders award individual grants and the broader ecosystem a funder is trying to influence.

Recently, I’ve shifted my focus toward evaluating at a more strategic level.

Not only should we ask, “Did this grantee meet their outputs?”, funders should also ask, “Is this portfolio coherent?Is it equitable? What measurable change is this portfolio driving, and how has it increased grantees’ capacity to sustain that change?

These are bigger questions. To answer them, funders — especially program officers responsible for managing funding portfolios — must step back and examine not only what they fund, but how and why they fund it.

(more…)

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.
Go to Top