More Data Doesn’t Lead to Better Decisions

If your organization stopped collecting a particular data point tomorrow, who would notice, and what decision would become harder to make?
Over time, “we’ve always collected this” starts to function like a justification, even when nobody can explain what decision it informs, or whether anyone would notice if it disappeared. A question can remain on a survey for years. A reporting template still asks the same metrics long after a program’s activities have changed. Staff may spend hours entering information into a database simply because the organization has built a routine around collecting it. Eventually, the process itself can make the data feel necessary.
For staff responsible for overseeing data collection, questioning those routines feels risky. You may inherit reporting systems that existed long before you joined the organization, manage requirements established by funders or leadership, or oversee information that several departments use differently. Still, regularly asking why your organization collects something is important. Data should have an identifiable purpose, whether that purpose involves learning, accountability, decision-making, or some combination of the three.
(more…)


