When “Evidence-Based” Becomes a Gatekeeper
In the nonprofit sector, “evidence-based” is treated as a marker of credibility, signaling rigor, effectiveness, and responsibility (especially in conversations about funding, accountability, and impact).
In theory, this makes sense. Evidence should help ensure that programs and services do what they claim to do. In practice, I’ve seen institutions define and enforce evidence-based standards in ways that quietly shape access to resources, trust, and organizational legitimacy.
Over time, I’ve come to see how evidence-based can function as a gatekeeper that shapes participation in ways that aren’t always intentional, transparent, or equitable.
(more…)




